OCR A Level Religious Studies H573
Complete Specification — A/A* Master Notes
A rule:* Every essay page should contain: precise scholar → argument → reasoning → example → objection → response → evaluative judgement.
Assessment
H573/01 — Philosophy of Religion
- 2 hours
- 120 marks
- 33.3%
H573/02 — Religion and Ethics
- 2 hours
- 120 marks
- 33.3%
H573/03–07 — Developments in Religious Thought
- 2 hours
- 120 marks
- 33.3%
Choose one:
- 03 Christianity
- 04 Islam
- 05 Judaism
- 06 Buddhism
- 07 Hinduism
COMPONENT 01 — PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION
Ancient Philosophical Influences
Plato
Theory of Forms
The world of appearances is:
- changing;
- imperfect;
- temporary.
The Forms are:
- eternal;
- perfect;
- immutable;
- intelligible.
Highest Form: Form of the Good.
Analogy of the Cave
Prisoners mistake shadows for reality.
Represents:
- ignorance;
- philosophical enlightenment;
- distinction between appearance and reality.
A* evaluation: Plato explains universals and objective value, but critics question whether a separate realm of Forms is necessary.
Aristotle
Rejects separate Forms.
Four Causes
- material;
- formal;
- efficient;
- final.
Example: statue
- material = bronze
- formal = shape
- efficient = sculptor
- final = purpose.
Prime Mover
Everything moves from potentiality to actuality.
An infinite regress of movers is rejected.
Prime Mover:
- pure actuality;
- unmoved;
- final cause;
- object of desire/thought.
A*: Aristotle's Prime Mover is not straightforwardly the personal God of classical Christianity.
Soul, Mind and Body
Plato — Dualism
Soul is distinct from body and capable of existing independently.
Body can distract soul from truth.
Aristotle
Soul is the form of the body.
More integrated than Platonic substance dualism.
Descartes
Mind: thinking, non-extended substance.
Body: extended physical substance.
Cogito:
thinking establishes existence of thinking self.
Problem: interaction between non-physical mind and physical body.
Materialism
Mental states depend on physical brain.
Dawkins-style materialism
Human persons can be explained biologically without immortal soul.
Evaluation: materialism fits neuroscience but faces questions about consciousness and personal identity.
Arguments for God's Existence
Teleological Argument
Aquinas' Fifth Way
Natural objects appear directed toward ends.
Non-intelligent things require intelligent direction.
Paley
Watchmaker analogy.
Order, complexity and purpose imply designer.
Hume
Challenges:
- weak analogy;
- imperfect world;
- multiple designers possible;
- cannot infer infinite/perfect God.
Darwin
Natural selection explains biological adaptation without direct design.
A*: Evolution attacks a specific biological-design inference, not every possible fine-tuning argument.
Cosmological Argument
Aquinas
First Way: motion.
Second: efficient causation.
Third: contingency.
All seek a foundational explanation.
Russell
Universe may be a brute fact.
Hume
Question applying causal reasoning beyond observed experience.
A*: Even if a necessary cause exists, further argument is needed to identify it with the God of religion.
Ontological Argument
Anselm
God: that than which nothing greater can be conceived.
If God existed only in mind, a greater being existing in reality could be conceived.
Therefore God exists necessarily.
Gaunilo
Perfect island objection.
Descartes
Existence belongs to supremely perfect being.
Kant
Existence is not a real predicate.
A*: central issue is whether necessary existence can be derived analytically from a concept.
Religious Experience
Mystical
Associated with union with divine/ultimate reality.
William James
Features:
- ineffability;
- noetic quality;
- transiency;
- passivity.
Numinous — Otto
Encounter with: mysterium tremendum et fascinans.
Conversion
Sudden or gradual transformation of belief/life.
Corporate Experience
Shared religious experience.
Swinburne
Principle of Credulity
Normally trust apparent experiences unless reason not to.
Principle of Testimony
Normally trust sincere reports of others.
Challenges:
- hallucination;
- drugs;
- psychology;
- conflicting religions.
A*: a natural explanation of the mechanism does not automatically disprove a religious interpretation.
Problem of Evil
Logical Problem
How can evil coexist with an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent God?
Evidential Problem
Quantity/intensity of apparently pointless suffering counts against God's existence.
Augustine
Evil is privation of good.
God created everything good.
Moral evil: misuse of free will.
Natural evil: traditionally connected to disorder following Fall.
Strength: protects divine goodness.
Problems:
- evolutionary history;
- inherited consequences;
- why create possibility of catastrophic fall?
Irenaeus / Hick
Humans created immature and develop morally.
World is a vale of soul-making.
Epistemic distance protects genuine freedom.
Strength: explains why challenge can have purpose.
Problem: extreme suffering can destroy rather than improve character.
Nature or Attributes of God
Omnipotence
God is all-powerful.
Questions:
- can God do logically impossible?
- can God limit own power?
Omniscience
God knows all truths.
Issue: divine foreknowledge vs human free will.
Omnibenevolence
Perfect goodness.
Problem of evil directly challenges this.
Eternity
Boethius
God possesses whole of life simultaneously: eternal present.
This may reconcile foreknowledge with freedom because God does not know future events before they occur.
Everlasting view
God exists through temporal succession.
Religious Language
Apophatic / Via Negativa
Speak about God by saying what God is not.
Strength: preserves transcendence.
Weakness: may provide too little positive content.
Analogy — Aquinas
God-language is neither:
- univocal;
- entirely equivocal.
Analogical language communicates partial similarity.
Symbol — Tillich
Symbols participate in reality to which they point and open deeper levels of meaning.
Weakness: symbolic claims may become difficult to evaluate for truth.
Verification — Ayer
Logical positivism: meaningful claims are analytic or empirically verifiable.
Religious metaphysical claims challenged.
Hick — Eschatological Verification
Some claims may be verifiable after death.
Falsification — Flew
Believers may refuse to allow any evidence to count against God-claims.
Hare — Bliks
Religious beliefs may function as fundamental ways of seeing.
Mitchell
Faith can remain rational despite contrary evidence if there are grounds for trust.
COMPONENT 02 — RELIGION AND ETHICS
Natural Law — Aquinas
Human beings have telos grounded in divine order.
Four Tiers
- eternal law;
- divine law;
- natural law;
- human law.
Primary Precepts
- preserve life;
- reproduce;
- educate offspring;
- live in society;
- worship God.
Secondary precepts derive from them.
Real vs Apparent Goods
Real good fulfils human telos.
Double Effect
Bad effect can be tolerated if:
- act good/neutral;
- bad effect not intended;
- good not achieved through bad;
- proportionate reason.
Evaluation: objective and coherent, but depends on fixed account of human nature.
Situation Ethics — Fletcher
Only absolute: agape.
Four Working Principles
- pragmatism;
- relativism;
- positivism;
- personalism.
Central claim: rules are guidelines; loving outcome takes priority.
Strength: flexible and person-centred.
Weakness: subjective and difficult to predict consequences.
Kantian Ethics
Good Will
Only thing good without qualification.
Duty
Moral worth comes from acting from duty.
Categorical Imperative
Universal Law
Act only on maxims that could be universalised.
Humanity Formula
Treat persons as ends, never merely means.
Strength: protects dignity.
Weakness: can be rigid when duties conflict.
Utilitarianism
Bentham
Act utilitarianism.
Greatest happiness principle.
Hedonic calculus:
- intensity;
- duration;
- certainty;
- propinquity;
- fecundity;
- purity;
- extent.
Mill
Higher and lower pleasures.
Rule-based tendencies and liberty.
Strength: focus on welfare.
Weakness: may sacrifice minority rights.
Applied Ethics
OCR applies theories to contemporary issues.
Euthanasia
Arguments supporting:
- autonomy;
- compassion;
- relief of suffering.
Against:
- sanctity of life;
- slippery slope;
- vulnerable persons;
- medical role.
Natural Law
Preservation of life weighs strongly against intentional euthanasia.
Situation Ethics
Could support euthanasia where agape requires ending intolerable suffering.
Utilitarianism
Depends on overall consequences.
Kant
Autonomy matters, but self-destruction raises issues around rational personhood and duty.
Business Ethics
Issues:
- profit;
- employees;
- consumers;
- environment;
- global labour;
- CSR.
Utilitarian
Choose policy maximising welfare.
Kantian
Do not exploit employees/consumers merely as means.
Natural Law
Business conduct should align with justice and human flourishing.
Real-world type example
Unsafe working conditions may lower cost but violate worker dignity and impose wider social harms.
Meta-Ethics
Naturalism
Moral facts can be connected to natural properties.
F.H. Bradley
Moral duty related to role in social organism.
Hume
Is–ought problem: cannot automatically derive moral obligation from descriptive fact.
Moore
Naturalistic fallacy. Goodness cannot simply be defined as a natural property.
Intuitionism
Prichard
Moral obligations apprehended intuitively.
Problem: conflicting intuitions.
Emotivism
Ayer
Moral claims express approval/disapproval.
“Stealing is wrong” ≈ emotional disapproval rather than factual proposition.
Stevenson
Moral language also seeks to influence attitudes.
Weakness: may understate rational ethical argument.
Conscience
Aquinas
Conscience: application of moral knowledge to action.
Synderesis: habitual grasp of basic moral principles.
Conscience can err through ignorance.
Freud
Conscience associated with superego.
Internalised parental/social authority.
Evaluation: Freud can explain guilt psychologically but may reduce moral experience to conditioning.
Sexual Ethics
Themes:
- premarital sex;
- extramarital sex;
- homosexuality;
- contraception.
Analyse through:
- Natural Law;
- Situation Ethics;
- Kant;
- Utilitarianism.
A*: do not assume every religious ethic gives identical conclusions; distinguish theory from denominational application.
COMPONENT 03–07 — DEVELOPMENTS IN RELIGIOUS THOUGHT
Christianity — H573/03
Religious Beliefs, Values and Teachings
Augustine on Human Nature
- original sin;
- fallen will;
- grace.
Death and Afterlife
- resurrection;
- heaven;
- hell;
- purgatory in Catholic thought;
- differing interpretations.
Knowledge of God
Natural/revealed theology debates.
Jesus Christ
Study:
- incarnation;
- Son of God;
- teacher of wisdom;
- liberator.
Bonhoeffer
Christ-centred ethics and costly discipleship.
Christian Moral Principles
- Bible;
- Church;
- reason;
- conscience;
- agape.
Religious Pluralism
Exclusivism
Christian revelation uniquely salvific.
Inclusivism
Christ may save those without explicit Christian faith.
Pluralism — Hick
Religions are culturally conditioned responses to the Real.
Criticism: may flatten distinctive religious truth claims.
Gender and Theology
Ruether
Critiques patriarchal theology.
Mary Daly
Radical feminist challenge to male-centred Christian structures.
Debates:
- ordination;
- language for God;
- family;
- equality.
Secularisation
Questions:
- has religion declined?
- has it changed rather than disappeared?
Evaluate:
- attendance;
- belief;
- public influence;
- individual spirituality.
Liberation Theology
Focus:
- poor/oppressed;
- structural injustice;
- praxis.
Marxist influence
Class analysis can be used without accepting atheistic materialism.
Criticism: risks politicising Christianity.
Islam — H573/04
Tawhid
Absolute unity of Allah.
Prophethood
Muhammad as final prophet.
Qur'an and Sunnah
Sources of authority.
Shari'ah
Derived through:
- Qur'an;
- Sunnah;
- scholarly reasoning/traditions.
Human Nature
Humans created with responsibility and capacity to submit to Allah.
Predestination and Freedom
Divine sovereignty vs human accountability.
Gender
Traditional and reformist interpretations.
Islam and State
Debates around:
- Shari'ah;
- secular government;
- political Islam.
Pluralism
People of the Book, truth and salvation.
Islam and Contemporary Society
Identity, modernity, globalisation and secularism.
Judaism — H573/05
Covenant
Abrahamic and Mosaic covenant.
Torah
Central divine teaching.
Mitzvot
Commandments shape daily holiness.
God
Strict monotheism.
Human Nature
Moral responsibility and yetzer traditions.
Messiah
- personal Messiah;
- Messianic age;
- differing Orthodox/Reform views.
Holocaust Theology
Questions:
- divine providence;
- covenant;
- evil;
- suffering.
Zionism
Religious and secular forms.
Gender
Orthodox, Reform and Liberal differences.
Secular Jewish Identity
Religion can overlap with ethnicity, culture and peoplehood.
Buddhism — H573/06
Four Noble Truths
- dukkha;
- craving;
- cessation;
- path.
Three Marks
- anicca;
- anatta;
- dukkha.
Dependent Origination
Existence arises through conditions.
Nirvana
Liberation from craving/ignorance.
Theravada
Arhat ideal.
Mahayana
Bodhisattva ideal and emptiness.
Meditation
Samatha/vipassana and broader traditions.
Ethics
- Five Precepts;
- compassion;
- skilful action;
- intention.
Gender
Debates over ordination and status of women.
Buddhism and Science
Often seen as compatible due meditation/non-creator framework, but traditional cosmological/rebirth claims still raise questions.
Secular Buddhism
Retains practices while sometimes reducing supernatural commitments.
Hinduism — H573/07
Brahman
Ultimate reality.
Nirguna
Without attributes.
Saguna
With attributes/personal manifestation.
Atman
Self.
Karma
Moral causation.
Samsara
Cycle of rebirth.
Moksha
Liberation.
Dharma
Duty/order.
Paths to Liberation
- karma yoga;
- jnana yoga;
- bhakti yoga.
Bhagavad Gita
Key source for duty, devotion and liberation.
Caste / Varna
Traditional social framework and modern criticism.
Gender
Scriptural traditions, goddess theology and reform.
Hinduism and Modernity
- nationalism;
- globalisation;
- diaspora;
- pluralism.
OCR ESSAY TECHNIQUE
OCR essays reward knowledge and critical evaluation, not memorised scholar lists.
Introduction
- define issue;
- identify debate;
- give thesis.
Paragraph
Claim → Scholar → Explanation → Counterargument → Assessment
Example:
“Hick's soul-making theodicy gives evil a developmental role, which avoids Augustine's dependence on a historical Fall. However, its success is limited by horrendous suffering that appears to destroy rather than form character…”
Conclusion
Rank arguments.
Do not write:
“Both sides are equally strong.”
State:
- which side;
- why;
- under what assumptions.
SCHOLAR BANK
Philosophy:
- Plato
- Aristotle
- Aquinas
- Paley
- Hume
- Anselm
- Gaunilo
- Descartes
- Kant
- James
- Otto
- Swinburne
- Augustine
- Hick
- Boethius
- Tillich
- Ayer
- Flew
- Hare
- Mitchell
Ethics:
- Aquinas
- Fletcher
- Kant
- Bentham
- Mill
- Bradley
- Moore
- Hume
- Prichard
- Ayer
- Stevenson
- Freud
Christian thought:
- Augustine
- Bonhoeffer
- Hick
- Ruether
- Daly
COMMON OCR LOST MARKS
- scholar name-dropping;
- Plato and Aristotle treated as identical;
- cosmological and teleological arguments confused;
- evolution said to “disprove God”;
- logical and evidential evil conflated;
- Augustine and Hick blended;
- verification/falsification confused;
- Kant treated as consequentialist;
- Situation Ethics reduced to “do what feels loving”;
- Natural Law confused with laws of nature;
- utilitarianism discussed without consequences;
- conscience treated as automatically divine;
- component 03 religion presented as internally uniform;
- essay conclusion merely repeats points.