AQA A-Level Politics 7152 — Complete Specification Notes
Assessment
- Paper 1: Government and politics of the UK — 2h, 77 marks, 33⅓%
- Paper 2: Government and politics of the USA + comparative politics — 2h, 77 marks, 33⅓%
- Paper 3: Political ideas — 2h, 77 marks, 33⅓%
Question types include 9-mark explain/analyse, 25-mark extract, and 25-mark essays.
PAPER 1 — GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS OF THE UK
1. British Constitution
Key concepts:
- uncodified constitution
- statute
- common law
- conventions
- authoritative works
- royal prerogative
- rule of law
- parliamentary sovereignty
- individual and collective rights
Important documents:
- Magna Carta 1215
- Bill of Rights 1689
- Act of Settlement 1701
- Parliament Acts 1911/1949
Parliamentary Sovereignty
Parliament can make or unmake any law and cannot legally bind future Parliaments.
Challenges/constraints:
- devolution
- courts and Human Rights Act
- political pressure
- referendums
- international commitments
- constitutional conventions
Constitutional Reform Since 1997
Know at least two in detail:
- devolution
- Human Rights Act
- Freedom of Information
- House of Lords reform
- Supreme Court creation
Evaluation:
- flexibility vs weak entrenchment
- executive power vs adaptability
- democratic responsiveness vs constitutional uncertainty
2. Parliament
Commons
Functions:
- legislation
- scrutiny
- confidence/supply
- representation
- constituency work
Lords
Functions:
- revision
- scrutiny
- expertise
- delay
Scrutiny
- PMQs
- ministerial questions
- select committees
- opposition days
- urgent questions
- debates
Select committees: strengths — expertise, cross-party work, evidence taking. weaknesses — limited enforcement, government can reject recommendations.
Executive Dominance
Government is strongest with:
- large majority
- strong party discipline
- control of timetable
- patronage
Parliament stronger with:
- narrow/no majority
- party rebellion
- Lords resistance
- committee pressure
- media/public scrutiny
3. Prime Minister and Cabinet
PM powers:
- patronage
- appointments
- party leadership
- agenda setting
- prerogative powers
- media visibility
PM constraints:
- Cabinet
- party
- Parliament
- judiciary
- events/crises
- public opinion
- devolution
Collective ministerial responsibility: ministers publicly support agreed policy or resign.
Individual ministerial responsibility: minister responsible for personal conduct and departmental performance.
Presidentialisation debate: for — personalised leadership, advisers, media. against — PM still depends on party, Commons, Cabinet and political support.
4. Judiciary
Judicial independence:
- security of tenure
- institutional separation
- appointments procedures
Supreme Court:
- final appeal
- constitutional cases
- judicial review
Judicial review examines legality of executive action.
Human Rights Act: courts may interpret compatibly and issue declarations of incompatibility but do not normally strike down Acts of Parliament.
Debate: judicial activism vs democratic legitimacy.
5. Devolution
Scotland
Scottish Parliament/Government; major powers include health, education, justice.
Wales
Senedd/Welsh Government.
Northern Ireland
Power-sharing institutions under peace settlement framework.
England
No equivalent national devolved legislature; metro mayors/local government.
Key concept: asymmetrical devolution.
Evaluation:
- local responsiveness
- national recognition
- dispersal of power versus
- constitutional complexity
- funding disputes
- independence pressures
- English question
6. Democracy and Participation
Direct democracy: referendums and direct votes.
Representative democracy: elected representatives make decisions.
Participation includes:
- voting
- parties
- pressure groups
- protest
- petitions
- digital campaigning
Evaluate turnout, trust, political inequality and civic engagement.
7. Elections and Referendums
FPTP
Strengths:
- simple
- constituency link
- can produce decisive government
Weaknesses:
- disproportionality
- wasted votes
- safe seats
- regional distortion
Other systems:
- AMS
- STV
- relevant supplementary/alternative systems
Criteria:
- proportionality
- representation
- accountability
- voter choice
- government stability
Referendums: strength — direct mandate. weakness — binary simplification, misinformation, unequal campaigns.
8. Political Parties
Functions:
- representation
- policy
- recruitment
- government/opposition
- political education
Know traditions and factions within:
- Conservatives
- Labour
- Liberal Democrats
Also know role of:
- Greens
- nationalist parties
- populist/minor parties
Party funding: donations, membership, transparency, public-funding debate.
9. Pressure Groups
Types:
- sectional
- cause/promotional
- insider
- outsider
Methods:
- lobbying
- consultation
- media
- litigation
- protest
- petitions
- direct action
Success depends on:
- resources
- membership
- public support
- insider access
- compatibility with government
- issue salience
Pluralist view: groups disperse power. Elite critique: business/wealth can create unequal access.
10. EU and UK Politics
Understand:
- historical significance of EU membership
- sovereignty debate
- reasons for withdrawal
- post-Brexit UK-EU relations
- effects on Parliament, executive and territorial politics
PAPER 2 — USA AND COMPARATIVE POLITICS
1. US Constitution
Features:
- codified
- entrenched
- federal
- separation of powers
- checks and balances
- Bill of Rights
Amendment process: deliberately difficult.
Federalism: division between federal and state governments.
Evaluate: rigidity vs stability; rights protection vs democratic adaptability.
2. Congress
House:
- 2-year terms
- population-based representation
Senate:
- two per state
- 6-year terms
Powers:
- lawmaking
- budget
- oversight
- impeachment
- confirmations
- treaty role
Gridlock may arise from:
- divided government
- bicameralism
- polarisation
- procedural rules
3. Presidency
Formal powers:
- veto
- commander-in-chief
- appointments
- treaties
- executive authority
Informal:
- persuasion
- media
- party leadership
- agenda setting
Constraints:
- Congress
- Supreme Court
- federalism
- elections
- public opinion
- bureaucracy
Imperial presidency debate: powerful foreign/security executive vs constitutional checks.
4. Supreme Court
Appointment: President nominates, Senate confirms.
Judicial review: Court can invalidate unconstitutional acts.
Key themes:
- civil liberties
- civil rights
- federalism
- activism vs restraint
- ideological appointments
5. US Elections and Voting
Presidential process:
- primaries/caucuses
- conventions
- general election
- Electoral College
Electoral College strengths:
- federalism
- constitutionally clear outcome
Weaknesses:
- popular vote winner can lose
- swing-state focus
- unequal vote weight
Campaign finance:
- fundraising
- PACs
- Super PACs
- outside spending
Voting behaviour:
- party ID
- race
- religion
- region
- gender
- age
- education
- economy
- candidate image
6. US Political Parties
Democrats and Republicans: know ideological coalitions, voter bases and internal factions.
US parties are:
- decentralised
- candidate-centred but increasingly polarised.
7. US Pressure Groups
Methods:
- lobbying
- campaign finance
- litigation
- endorsements
- grassroots mobilisation
Why influential:
- fragmented institutions
- federalism
- multiple access points
8. Civil Rights
Study rights through:
- Constitution/Bill of Rights
- Congress
- Supreme Court
- federalism
- social movements
Apply to debates such as:
- racial equality
- voting rights
- speech
- religion
- guns
- abortion
- LGBTQ+ rights
COMPARATIVE POLITICS
Constitution
UK:
- uncodified
- flexible
- parliamentary sovereignty
USA:
- codified
- entrenched
- constitutional supremacy
Executive
UK PM:
- fusion of powers
- normally Commons majority
US President:
- separate election
- separation of powers
Legislature
UK Commons: government often dominates with majority.
US Congress: greater institutional independence.
Judiciary
UK: courts do not normally strike down Acts of Parliament.
USA: Supreme Court can invalidate unconstitutional laws.
Territorial Power
UK: devolution.
USA: constitutionally protected federalism.
Parties
UK: more disciplined/centralised.
USA: more decentralised/candidate-centred.
Elections
UK: parliamentary FPTP.
USA: Electoral College + separate congressional elections.
Comparative essay rule: every developed paragraph should compare both systems directly.
PAPER 3 — POLITICAL IDEAS
Liberalism
Core:
- individualism
- freedom
- rationalism
- equality
- toleration
- limited government
Classical: negative freedom, minimal state, free market.
Modern: positive freedom, enabling state, welfare/social justice.
Thinkers:
Locke
natural rights, consent, limited government.
J.S. Mill
harm principle; self-/other-regarding actions; individuality.
Rawls
justice as fairness; veil of ignorance; equal liberties; difference principle.
T.H. Green
positive freedom; self-development; enabling state.
Wollstonecraft
reason, equal rights, critique of patriarchy/aristocracy.
Friedan
equal rights and critique of domestic confinement.
Debates: negative vs positive liberty; minimal vs enabling state.
Conservatism
Core:
- tradition
- authority
- hierarchy
- property
- pragmatism
- imperfect human nature
Traditional conservatism vs New Right.
Thinkers:
Hobbes
pessimistic human nature; strong sovereign.
Burke
tradition, organic society, cautious change.
Oakeshott
anti-rationalism and practical knowledge.
Ayn Rand
rational egoism, individual rights, anti-collectivism.
Nozick
minimal state, entitlement, market inequality.
Debates: paternalism vs individualism; tradition vs free-market disruption.
Socialism
Core:
- equality
- community
- cooperation
- class
- social justice
Revolutionary socialism vs social democracy vs Third Way.
Thinkers:
Marx and Engels
class struggle, historical materialism, capitalism/exploitation.
Rosa Luxemburg
mass action and revolutionary socialism.
Beatrice Webb
gradual reform and cooperatives.
Anthony Crosland
revisionism; equality/welfare over nationalisation.
Anthony Giddens
Third Way; social investment; rights/responsibilities.
Debates: revolution vs reform; equality of outcome vs opportunity; common ownership vs markets.
Optional Ideology — Nationalism
Core:
- nation
- sovereignty
- self-determination
- civic/ethnic
- minority/state nationalism
Thinkers:
- Rousseau
- Herder
- Mazzini
- Marcus Garvey
- Charles Maurras
Optional Ideology — Feminism
Core:
- patriarchy
- sex/gender
- public/private divide
- equality/difference
Strands:
- liberal
- radical
- socialist
- difference/intersectional
Thinkers:
- Charlotte Perkins Gilman
- Simone de Beauvoir
- Kate Millett
- Sheila Rowbotham
- bell hooks
Optional Ideology — Multiculturalism
Core:
- diversity
- minority rights
- recognition
- integration
- assimilation
- anti-discrimination
Thinkers:
- Isaiah Berlin
- Will Kymlicka
- Charles Taylor
- Tariq Modood
- Bikhu Parekh
Optional Ideology — Anarchism
Core:
- autonomy
- anti-statism
- voluntary cooperation
- opposition to coercive authority
Thinkers:
- Max Stirner
- Mikhail Bakunin
- Emma Goldman
- Peter Kropotkin
- Pierre-Joseph Proudhon
Optional Ideology — Ecologism
Core:
- sustainability
- intrinsic value of nature
- limits to growth
- light/dark greens
Thinkers:
- Aldo Leopold
- Rachel Carson
- E.F. Schumacher
- Carolyn Merchant
- Murray Bookchin
EXAM TECHNIQUE
9 Marks
Use 3 developed analytical points: Point → explain → example → significance.
25-Mark Extract
- identify extract argument
- use own knowledge
- test claim
- balance
- reasoned conclusion
25-Mark Essay
Argument → evidence → counterargument → judgement.
Comparative Essay
Make explicit UK/USA comparison in every paragraph.
Ideology Essay
Organise by:
- human nature
- state
- society
- economy
- freedom/equality and compare thinkers/strands.
COMMON LOST MARKS
- calling UK constitution simply "unwritten"
- saying UK Supreme Court can strike down Acts like US Court
- confusing devolution and federalism
- treating PM as unconstrained
- confusing collective and individual ministerial responsibility
- saying FPTP is proportional
- comparing UK and USA in separate blocks
- confusing federalism with separation of powers
- ideology thinker name-dropping without argument
- confusing negative freedom with "bad freedom"
- treating socialism as one unified doctrine
- optional thinkers placed under wrong ideology