HistoryAQAPro

A-Level History — Breadth, Depth & Enquiry

13 topics

AQA grade boundaries

Verified data

Compare course practice marks with official grade-boundary data when verified datasets are available.

View boundaries
Exam board
Complete Specification·Notes·120 min read

AQA History 7042 Complete Specification

Next recommended activity

Continue this lesson

Finish the current topic, then mark it complete when you reach the end.

Free preview. Unlock the full course to read every lesson.

AQA A-Level History 7042

Complete Specification — A* Master Notes

Purpose: This is the master course file for all AQA 7042 routes. A student takes one Breadth Study, one Depth Study and one Historical Investigation. The website should store every route but only expose the route selected by the learner.

A rule:* History is not a chronology test. Every topic page must teach factual knowledge through the second-order concepts of cause, consequence, change, continuity, similarity, difference and significance, plus interpretation/source evaluation.

Assessment

Component 1 — Breadth Study

  • 2h30
  • 80 marks
  • 40%
  • c.100 years
  • Section A: compulsory interpretations question, 30 marks
  • Section B: two essays from three, 25 marks each

Component 2 — Depth Study

  • 2h30
  • 80 marks
  • 40%
  • shorter period in depth
  • Section A: compulsory contemporary source question, 30 marks
  • Section B: two essays from three, 25 marks each

Component 3 — Historical Investigation

  • 3500–4500 words
  • 40 marks
  • 20%
  • independently researched
  • question located within c.100 years
  • must not duplicate Components 1 or 2

AQA requires:

  • more than one country;
  • substantial British history;
  • non-British history;
  • overall chronological range of at least 200 years.

THE A* HISTORIAN TOOLKIT

Causation

Do not list causes. Rank them.

Use categories:

  • political;
  • economic;
  • social;
  • religious/ideological;
  • military;
  • individual leadership;
  • long-term structural;
  • short-term trigger.

High-level judgement:

“X was the most important cause because it created the underlying conditions without which Y could not have produced the same outcome.”

Distinguish:

  • necessary;
  • sufficient;
  • enabling;
  • accelerating;
  • triggering causes.

Change and Continuity

Measure change by:

  • pace;
  • scale;
  • depth;
  • geographical reach;
  • durability;
  • social groups affected.

A*:

“The period saw substantial institutional change but greater continuity in underlying elite control.”

Significance

Judge significance through:

  • immediate impact;
  • long-term consequences;
  • breadth;
  • depth;
  • symbolic importance;
  • impact on later developments.

Similarity and Difference

Use common criteria:

  • aims;
  • methods;
  • support;
  • opposition;
  • impact;
  • structure;
  • ideology.

Consequence

Distinguish:

  • intended/unintended;
  • short/long term;
  • direct/indirect.

COMPONENT 1 — BREADTH STUDIES

1A The Age of the Crusades, c1071–1204

Big Questions

  • Why did crusading emerge?
  • Why did crusaders succeed/fail at different points?
  • How important were religion, leadership, resources and Muslim division?
  • How did relations between crusaders, Byzantium and Islamic powers change?
  • Why did crusading move from Jerusalem toward Constantinople by 1204?

Core Chronology

  • Byzantine pressure before 1095
  • Council of Clermont 1095
  • First Crusade 1096–99
  • establishment of crusader states
  • Second Crusade 1147–49
  • rise of Nur ad-Din and Saladin
  • Hattin/Jerusalem 1187
  • Third Crusade 1189–92
  • Fourth Crusade and sack of Constantinople 1204

A* Themes

Motivation

  • piety/remission of sins
  • papal leadership
  • knightly culture
  • land/status
  • family/network pressures

Success and Failure

Compare:

  • leadership;
  • unity;
  • logistics;
  • Byzantine relations;
  • Muslim political division/unity.

Interpretations

Possible debates:

  • spirituality vs material motivation;
  • colonialism vs religious movement;
  • papal direction vs aristocratic initiative.

1B Spain in the Age of Discovery, 1469–1598

Core Themes

  • dynastic union of Ferdinand and Isabella;
  • royal authority;
  • religious uniformity;
  • conquest of Granada;
  • exploration and empire;
  • Charles I/V;
  • Philip II;
  • finance, taxation and imperial overstretch;
  • revolt and regionalism.

A* Debates

  • how far Spain became a unified monarchy;
  • religion as source of cohesion/control;
  • benefit vs burden of empire;
  • extent Philip II was responsible for difficulties.

1C The Tudors: England, 1485–1603

Rulers

  • Henry VII
  • Henry VIII
  • Edward VI
  • Mary I
  • Elizabeth I

Core Themes

Monarchy and Government

  • royal authority;
  • ministers;
  • Parliament;
  • local government;
  • faction.

Religion

  • late medieval Church;
  • break with Rome;
  • Protestant reform;
  • Catholic restoration;
  • Elizabethan settlement.

Society and Economy

  • population;
  • inflation;
  • poverty;
  • enclosure;
  • trade.

Rebellion

  • Yorkshire/Pilgrimage of Grace;
  • Western/Kett;
  • Wyatt;
  • Northern Earls.

Foreign Policy

France, Scotland, Spain, Ireland.

A* Judgements

  • Tudor state became stronger but remained dependent on elites;
  • religious change was uneven and contested;
  • Elizabethan stability should not be mistaken for absence of crisis.

1D Stuart Britain and the Crisis of Monarchy, 1603–1702

Core Chronology

  • James I
  • Charles I
  • Civil Wars
  • Commonwealth/Protectorate
  • Restoration
  • James II
  • Glorious Revolution
  • William III

Core Themes

  • finance;
  • religion;
  • Parliament;
  • prerogative;
  • political nation;
  • army;
  • radicalism;
  • restoration settlement;
  • emergence of party;
  • constitutional monarchy.

Central Debate

Was the Civil War caused mainly by:

  • long-term structural conflict;
  • religion;
  • Charles I's personality/policies;
  • short-term crisis 1637–42?

A*: avoid inevitable-war narratives.


1E Russia in the Age of Absolutism and Enlightenment, 1682–1796

Focus:

  • Peter the Great;
  • succession;
  • Catherine II;
  • state reform;
  • nobility;
  • peasantry/serfdom;
  • Church;
  • military;
  • westernisation;
  • empire.

Debates:

  • modernisation vs coercion;
  • Enlightenment rhetoric vs autocracy;
  • strength of state vs weakness of society.

1F Industrialisation and the People: Britain, c1783–1885

Themes:

  • industrial growth;
  • urbanisation;
  • working conditions;
  • poverty;
  • protest;
  • trade unions;
  • political reform;
  • public health;
  • class formation.

Key conceptual question: Did industrialisation improve or worsen living standards?

Use:

  • real wages;
  • mortality;
  • housing;
  • hours;
  • regional/class differences.

1G Challenge and Transformation: Britain, c1851–1964

Themes:

  • political reform and democracy;
  • Liberal/Conservative rivalry;
  • rise of Labour;
  • economy/industry;
  • empire;
  • social reform;
  • war;
  • welfare state;
  • changing society.

A* debate: continuity of elite governance vs democratic transformation.


1H Tsarist and Communist Russia, 1855–1964

Rulers:

  • Alexander II
  • Alexander III
  • Nicholas II
  • Lenin
  • Stalin
  • Khrushchev

Themes:

  • autocracy/dictatorship;
  • reform/repression;
  • economy;
  • peasantry/workers;
  • nationalities;
  • opposition;
  • war;
  • ideology.

A* comparative judgement: Communist rule changed ideology/property relations radically but retained strong central coercive traditions.


1J The British Empire, c1857–1967

Themes:

  • expansion;
  • informal/formal empire;
  • trade;
  • strategic interests;
  • settler colonies;
  • India;
  • Africa;
  • imperial ideology;
  • resistance;
  • world wars;
  • decolonisation.

Debates:

  • economics vs strategy;
  • collaboration vs coercion;
  • nationalism vs British weakness in decolonisation.

1K The Making of a Superpower: USA, 1865–1975

Themes:

  • Reconstruction;
  • industrialisation;
  • immigration;
  • race;
  • politics;
  • progressivism;
  • foreign expansion;
  • world wars;
  • Depression/New Deal;
  • Cold War;
  • civil rights;
  • social change.

A*: separate growth in economic, military, diplomatic and cultural power.


1L The Quest for Political Stability: Germany, 1871–1991

Periods:

  • Imperial Germany;
  • Weimar;
  • Nazi dictatorship;
  • occupation/division;
  • FRG/GDR;
  • reunification.

Themes:

  • legitimacy;
  • democracy;
  • nationalism;
  • economy;
  • elites;
  • extremism;
  • foreign pressures.

A*: political stability can coexist with authoritarianism; define criterion before judging.


COMPONENT 2 — DEPTH STUDIES

2A Royal Authority and the Angevin Kings, 1154–1216

  • Henry II's restoration of authority;
  • law/justice;
  • Church conflict and Becket;
  • Angevin Empire;
  • Richard I;
  • John;
  • baronial revolt;
  • Magna Carta. Core debate: personal kingship vs structural limits on medieval monarchy.

2B The Wars of the Roses, 1450–1499

  • Henry VI's weakness;
  • Yorkist challenge;
  • civil conflict;
  • Edward IV;
  • Richard III;
  • Bosworth;
  • Henry VII consolidation. Debate: dynastic ambition vs failure of kingship vs noble instability.

2C The Reformation in Europe, c1500–1564

  • late medieval Church;
  • Luther;
  • German princes;
  • Calvin;
  • Catholic response;
  • spread of reform;
  • political/social consequences. Debate: theology vs politics/social grievance.

2D Religious Conflict and the Church in England, c1529–c1570

  • Henrician break;
  • dissolution;
  • Edwardian Protestantism;
  • Marian restoration;
  • Elizabethan settlement;
  • resistance. Debate: top-down Reformation vs popular reception.

2E The English Revolution, 1625–1660

  • Charles I;
  • personal rule;
  • religious crisis;
  • Long Parliament;
  • Civil War;
  • regicide;
  • Commonwealth;
  • Cromwell;
  • Restoration. Debate: revolution, rebellion or civil war?

2F The Sun King: Louis XIV, France and Europe, 1643–1715

  • minority/Fronde;
  • royal government;
  • Versailles;
  • nobility;
  • religion;
  • economy/Colbert;
  • war;
  • succession crisis. Debate: absolutism in theory vs negotiated monarchy in practice.

2G The Birth of the USA, 1760–1801

  • imperial crisis;
  • taxation;
  • colonial resistance;
  • independence;
  • Revolutionary War;
  • Articles;
  • Constitution;
  • Federalists/Republicans. Debate: ideology vs material/political grievance.

2H France in Revolution, 1774–1815

  • ancien régime;
  • 1789;
  • constitutional monarchy;
  • republic/Terror;
  • Directory;
  • Napoleon;
  • empire/defeat. Debate: continuity between Revolution and Napoleon.

2J America: A Nation Divided, c1845–1877

  • expansion;
  • slavery;
  • sectionalism;
  • party collapse;
  • secession;
  • Civil War;
  • emancipation;
  • Reconstruction. Debate: slavery as fundamental cause vs political failure.

2K International Relations and Global Conflict, c1890–1941

  • alliances;
  • imperial rivalry;
  • First World War causes;
  • peace settlement;
  • League;
  • appeasement;
  • rise of dictators;
  • outbreak of WWII. Debate: structural instability vs individual state responsibility.

2L Italy and Fascism, c1900–1945

  • liberal Italy;
  • war;
  • post-war crisis;
  • Fascist rise;
  • consolidation;
  • dictatorship;
  • economy/society;
  • foreign policy;
  • collapse. Debate: coercion vs consent in Fascist rule.

2M Wars and Welfare: Britain in Transition, 1906–1957

  • Liberal reforms;
  • constitutional crisis;
  • WWI;
  • interwar politics/economy;
  • Depression;
  • WWII;
  • Labour 1945;
  • welfare state;
  • Conservative response. Debate: war as driver of social/political transformation.

2N Revolution and Dictatorship: Russia, 1917–1953

  • February/October;
  • Bolshevik consolidation;
  • Civil War;
  • NEP;
  • Stalin's rise;
  • collectivisation;
  • industrialisation;
  • terror;
  • war;
  • late Stalinism. Debate: Lenin-to-Stalin continuity.

2O Democracy and Nazism: Germany, 1918–1945

  • Weimar revolution/constitution;
  • crises 1919–23;
  • stability 1924–29;
  • Depression;
  • Nazi rise;
  • dictatorship;
  • economy/society;
  • persecution;
  • war. Debate: collapse of Weimar vs strength of Nazism.

2P The Transformation of China, 1936–1997

  • Nationalists/Communists;
  • Japanese war;
  • civil war;
  • Maoist state;
  • Great Leap;
  • Cultural Revolution;
  • Deng reforms;
  • social/economic transformation. Debate: Maoist rupture vs longer Chinese continuities.

2Q The American Dream: Reality and Illusion, 1945–1980

  • Truman/Eisenhower;
  • prosperity;
  • civil rights;
  • Kennedy/Johnson;
  • Vietnam;
  • Nixon;
  • social movements;
  • 1970s economic/political crisis. Debate: expansion of opportunity vs persistent inequality.

2R The Cold War, c1945–1991

  • origins;
  • Europe;
  • Asia;
  • nuclear competition;
  • crises;
  • détente;
  • renewed tension;
  • Gorbachev;
  • collapse. Debate: ideology vs security vs leadership.

2S The Making of Modern Britain, 1951–2007

  • consensus;
  • affluence;
  • social change;
  • Wilson/Heath;
  • crisis 1970s;
  • Thatcher;
  • Major;
  • New Labour;
  • constitutional change. Debate: Thatcher as decisive turning point.

2T The Crisis of Communism: USSR and Soviet Empire, 1953–2000

  • Khrushchev;
  • de-Stalinisation;
  • Brezhnev;
  • stagnation;
  • Eastern Europe;
  • Gorbachev;
  • collapse of USSR;
  • Yeltsin. Debate: structural weakness vs reform-driven collapse.

SOURCE ANALYSIS — COMPONENT 2

For each source assess:

  1. content — what claim/information?
  2. provenance — author, role, audience, date, purpose;
  3. context — what was happening at that exact moment?
  4. value — what can it reveal?
  5. limitation — not generic bias, but specific limitation;
  6. comparison — use all sources together;
  7. judgement — how useful for the precise enquiry?

Bad:

“The source is biased because the author was a politician.”

Better:

“As a cabinet minister defending policy publicly, the author had reason to minimise divisions, making the source particularly valuable for official presentation but less reliable as evidence of private Cabinet consensus.”


INTERPRETATIONS — COMPONENT 1

Interpretation question is not source provenance.

Evaluate:

  • central argument;
  • evidence used;
  • emphasis;
  • omissions;
  • conceptual approach;
  • own contextual knowledge.

Do not attack an interpretation because the historian was born later; historical interpretation is expected to be retrospective.

A*:

“Interpretation A is more convincing on political causation because its emphasis on X is supported by Y and Z; however, it underestimates the economic pressure shown by…”


25-MARK ESSAY FRAMEWORK

Introduction

  • define issue;
  • set criteria;
  • state provisional judgement.

Main Paragraph

Argument Precise evidence Analysis of second-order concept Counter-evidence Mini-judgement

Conclusion

Rank explanations/factors and explain why.

Avoid narrative chronology.


COMPONENT 3 — HISTORICAL INVESTIGATION

Question Design

Good questions:

  • have genuine debate;
  • cover c.100-year context;
  • permit analysis of change/causation/significance;
  • have accessible primary and secondary material.

Requirements for A*

  • sustained argument;
  • precise knowledge;
  • at least three historians/interpretations meaningfully evaluated;
  • primary-source evidence;
  • explicit methodology;
  • balanced conclusion.

Historian Evaluation

Do not write biography.

Evaluate:

  • thesis;
  • evidence base;
  • methodology;
  • explanatory emphasis;
  • how convincing against competing evidence.

Primary Evidence

Use provenance only where it changes evidential value.


COMMON AQA LOST MARKS

  • narrative instead of argument;
  • factor paragraphs not ranked;
  • missing whole-period coverage;
  • “biased” used as a complete source evaluation;
  • provenance evaluated with no content;
  • interpretations treated like contemporary sources;
  • historian's nationality used as automatic criticism;
  • essay conclusions merely repeat introduction;
  • causation question answered with consequences;
  • change question gives chronology but no measure of extent;
  • significance judged only by immediate impact;
  • NEA historian quotations inserted without evaluation.