English LanguageAQAPro

A-Level English Language — Complete AQA Course

15 topics

AQA grade boundaries

Verified data

Compare course practice marks with official grade-boundary data when verified datasets are available.

View boundaries
Exam board
Complete Specification·Notes·120 min read

AQA English Language 7702 Complete Specification

Next recommended activity

Continue this lesson

Finish the current topic, then mark it complete when you reach the end.

Free preview. Unlock the full course to read every lesson.

AQA A-Level English Language 7702

Complete Specification — A/A* Revision Notes

Assessment Map

Paper 1 — Language, the Individual and Society

  • 2h30
  • 100 marks
  • 40%

Section A — Textual Variations and Representations

  • analyse Text A — 25
  • analyse Text B — 25
  • compare — 20

Section B — Children's Language Development

  • one discursive essay from two — 30
  • data may be spoken, written or multimodal
  • ages 0–11

Paper 2 — Language Diversity and Change

  • 2h30
  • 100 marks
  • 40%

Content:

  • language diversity;
  • language change;
  • language discourses;
  • writing skills;
  • integrated language analysis.

NEA — Language in Action

  • 20%

Language Investigation

  • 2,000 words excluding data

Original Writing

  • one piece, 750 words
  • accompanying commentary, 750 words

CORE LANGUAGE FRAMEWORKS

These frameworks underpin every component.

Lexis and Semantics

Lexis

Vocabulary choices.

Useful terminology:

  • concrete noun;
  • abstract noun;
  • proper noun;
  • common noun;
  • adjective;
  • adverb;
  • verb;
  • dynamic verb;
  • stative verb;
  • modal verb;
  • semantic field;
  • collocation;
  • idiom;
  • euphemism;
  • dysphemism;
  • jargon;
  • slang;
  • taboo;
  • neologism;
  • archaism.

Semantics

Meaning.

Concepts:

  • denotation;
  • connotation;
  • semantic broadening;
  • semantic narrowing;
  • amelioration;
  • pejoration;
  • metaphor;
  • metonymy;
  • irony;
  • ambiguity.

A* analysis: Do not write:

“The writer uses an adjective.”

Write:

“The evaluative adjective ‘reckless’ encodes a negative judgement and positions the referent as socially irresponsible, supporting the text's broader representation of…”


Grammar

Word Classes

  • nouns;
  • verbs;
  • adjectives;
  • adverbs;
  • pronouns;
  • determiners;
  • prepositions;
  • conjunctions;
  • interjections.

Noun Phrases

Head noun plus modifiers.

Pre-modification:

“the controversial new government policy”

Post-modification:

“the policy introduced last year”

Verb Phrases

Tense:

  • present;
  • past.

Aspect:

  • progressive;
  • perfect.

Voice:

  • active;
  • passive.

Passive can:

  • foreground affected participant;
  • obscure agent;
  • create impersonal tone.

Modality

Epistemic: certainty/probability.

Deontic: permission/obligation.

Examples:

  • must;
  • should;
  • may;
  • might;
  • certainly;
  • perhaps.

Clause Types

  • declarative;
  • interrogative;
  • imperative;
  • exclamative.

Sentence Structures

  • simple;
  • compound;
  • complex;
  • compound-complex.

Subordination

Can:

  • foreground/background information;
  • create hypotaxis;
  • encode logical relations.

Morphology

Morpheme: smallest meaningful grammatical unit.

Free Morpheme

Can stand alone: play

Bound Morpheme

Cannot: -ed, un-, -s.

Inflectional Morphology

Changes grammatical form:

  • plural;
  • tense;
  • comparison.

Derivational Morphology

Creates new lexical item/class: happy → happiness

Child-language analysis should distinguish morphological development from syntax.


Phonetics, Phonology and Prosodics

Phoneme

Smallest contrastive sound unit.

IPA

Use phonemic transcription when relevant.

Accent

Pronunciation variety.

Dialect

Variety involving grammar/lexis as well as pronunciation.

Prosody

  • intonation;
  • stress;
  • pitch;
  • tempo;
  • rhythm;
  • volume.

Spoken data:

  • pauses;
  • fillers;
  • overlaps;
  • false starts;
  • repairs;
  • non-fluency;
  • backchannels.

A*: Spoken language is not “incorrect writing”. Analyse it as a mode with its own norms.


Pragmatics

Meaning in context.

Key concepts:

  • inference;
  • implicature;
  • deixis;
  • presupposition;
  • politeness;
  • face;
  • speech acts.

Grice

Cooperative Principle and maxims:

  • quality;
  • quantity;
  • relation;
  • manner.

Flouting can create:

  • humour;
  • irony;
  • implied criticism.

Brown and Levinson

Positive face: desire for approval.

Negative face: desire for freedom from imposition.

Face-threatening acts may be mitigated through politeness.


Discourse

How texts are structured beyond sentence level.

Terms:

  • cohesion;
  • coherence;
  • adjacency pairs;
  • turn-taking;
  • topic management;
  • discourse markers;
  • anaphoric reference;
  • cataphoric reference;
  • substitution;
  • ellipsis;
  • lexical cohesion.

Graphology

Visual design.

Analyse:

  • layout;
  • font;
  • headings;
  • images;
  • colour;
  • spacing;
  • punctuation;
  • emojis;
  • hyperlinks;
  • multimodal composition.

Do not treat graphology as decoration: connect to audience and function.


TEXTUAL VARIATIONS AND REPRESENTATIONS

AQA expects analysis of language as representation.

Context Variables

Audience

Who is addressed?

Consider:

  • expert/non-expert;
  • individual/mass;
  • age;
  • ideology;
  • relationship with producer.

Purpose

Possible:

  • inform;
  • persuade;
  • entertain;
  • instruct;
  • advise;
  • complain;
  • narrate;
  • construct identity.

Texts usually have multiple purposes.

Genre

Socially recognised text type with conventions.

Mode

  • spoken;
  • written;
  • multimodal;
  • computer-mediated.

Avoid binary spoken/written stereotypes.

Field

Subject/activity.

Tenor

Relationship between participants.


Representation

Language constructs rather than simply reflects reality.

Texts represent:

  • individuals;
  • social groups;
  • places;
  • events;
  • institutions;
  • ideas.

Questions:

  1. What lexical field labels the subject?
  2. Who has agency in clauses?
  3. Who is passive/deleted?
  4. What modality presents certainty?
  5. What presuppositions are taken for granted?
  6. What voices are included/excluded?
  7. How is reader positioned?

Transitivity

Useful Hallidayan concepts:

  • material processes;
  • mental processes;
  • relational processes;
  • verbal processes.

Agency: Who acts?

Passive constructions may conceal agency.


Older Texts

Paper 1 includes older and contemporary texts.

Analyse historically:

  • orthography;
  • punctuation;
  • syntax;
  • lexis;
  • semantic shift;
  • genre conventions;
  • audience assumptions;
  • print technology;
  • standardisation.

Do not merely list “old-fashioned words”.


CHILDREN'S LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT

Spoken Acquisition

Pre-Linguistic Development

Features:

  • crying;
  • cooing;
  • babbling;
  • proto-words;
  • gesture;
  • joint attention.

One-Word / Holophrastic Stage

Single word expresses larger meaning.

Examples may function as:

  • request;
  • label;
  • protest.

Two-Word Stage

Early combinations:

  • agent + action;
  • possession;
  • recurrence.

Telegraphic Stage

Content words dominate; function words may be omitted.

Avoid rigid stage ages: development is variable.


Phonological Development

Processes may include:

  • substitution;
  • deletion;
  • consonant-cluster reduction;
  • assimilation;
  • reduplication.

A*: State the exact phonological process rather than “child says it wrong”.


Lexical Development

Overextension

Word used too broadly.

Underextension

Word used too narrowly.

Overgeneralisation

Rule applied too widely.

Example: goed

Shows rule formation, not mere imitation.


Grammar Development

Brown's Morphemes

Development of:

  • progressive -ing;
  • plural;
  • irregular past;
  • possessive;
  • articles;
  • regular past;
  • third person;
  • auxiliaries.

Negatives

Progress from simple external “no” toward internal auxiliary constructions.

Interrogatives

Development toward inversion and auxiliary use.


Functions of Child Language — Halliday

Functions:

  • instrumental;
  • regulatory;
  • interactional;
  • personal;
  • heuristic;
  • imaginative;
  • representational.

Useful for data but do not force every utterance into a label.


Theories of Acquisition

Behaviourism — Skinner

Language learned through:

  • imitation;
  • reinforcement;
  • conditioning.

Strength: explains some lexical/social learning.

Weakness: children produce novel forms and overgeneralisations adults do not model.

Nativism — Chomsky

Humans have innate linguistic capacity.

Concepts:

  • language acquisition device historically;
  • universal grammatical predisposition;
  • poverty of stimulus.

Strength: accounts for rapid rule-based creativity.

Weakness: underplays interaction and usage.

Cognitive — Piaget

Language development depends on wider cognitive development.

Concept formation precedes some linguistic structures.

Criticism: language and cognition may influence each other bidirectionally.

Interactionism — Bruner

Language Acquisition Support System.

Caregiver interaction:

  • scaffolding;
  • routines;
  • joint attention.

Vygotsky

Social interaction and Zone of Proximal Development.


Child-Directed Speech

Common features:

  • higher pitch;
  • exaggerated intonation;
  • repetition;
  • simplified syntax;
  • concrete vocabulary;
  • questions;
  • recasts;
  • expansions.

Functions:

  • attract attention;
  • structure interaction;
  • support vocabulary/grammar.

Not universal across cultures.


Written Development

Analyse:

  • spelling;
  • punctuation;
  • graphology;
  • sentence structure;
  • genre awareness;
  • audience;
  • cohesion.

Spelling Strategies

  • phonetic;
  • visual;
  • morphological.

Development may include invented spelling.

Avoid deficit model.


LANGUAGE DIVERSITY

Accent and Dialect

Regional Variation

Features can involve:

  • phonology;
  • lexis;
  • grammar;
  • discourse.

Concepts:

  • dialect levelling;
  • regional dialect levelling;
  • diffusion;
  • mobility;
  • accommodation.

Trudgill

Norwich research: social class and gender correlated with pronunciation variants.

Use cautiously: historical study and locality-specific.

Labov

Martha's Vineyard: centralisation related to island identity.

New York department stores: post-vocalic /r/ associated with social stratification/style shifting.

A* point: Variation indexes social identity rather than simply “correctness”.


Sociolect

Language variation associated with social group/class.

Avoid deterministic claims: speaker style shifts according to context.


Ethnolect / Multicultural Varieties

Language can index ethnic/community identity.

Multicultural London English:

  • contact variety;
  • influenced by multiple language communities;
  • used beyond a single ethnicity.

Avoid describing it as “broken English”.


Gender and Language

Deficit — Lakoff

Features historically associated with women:

  • hedges;
  • tag questions;
  • intensifiers;
  • polite forms.

Criticism: based on intuition/limited evidence and assumes male norm.

Dominance — Zimmerman and West

Interruptions linked to male conversational dominance in some contexts.

Difference — Tannen

Different conversational subcultures:

  • status/support;
  • report/rapport;
  • independence/intimacy.

Criticism: overgeneralises binary gender.

Diversity / Performativity

Gender is performed/contextual rather than fixed speech style.

Use:

  • Butler conceptually;
  • Coates;
  • Cameron's critique of myths.

A*: gender interacts with class, age, sexuality, context and community of practice.


Age

Age-grading: speaker changes language across life stages.

Generational change: different cohorts preserve different forms.

Teen language:

  • innovation;
  • identity;
  • intensifiers;
  • slang.

Avoid saying slang proves language deterioration.


Occupation

Occupational varieties:

  • jargon;
  • abbreviations;
  • specialist discourse;
  • power asymmetry.

Institutional talk may constrain turn-taking.


LANGUAGE CHANGE

Causes

  • technology;
  • language contact;
  • migration;
  • social change;
  • cultural innovation;
  • economy;
  • identity;
  • prestige;
  • analogy;
  • simplification;
  • random variation.

Lexical Change

Processes:

  • borrowing;
  • compounding;
  • blending;
  • clipping;
  • acronym;
  • initialism;
  • conversion;
  • affixation;
  • eponyms;
  • back-formation.

Semantic Change

  • broadening;
  • narrowing;
  • amelioration;
  • pejoration;
  • metaphorical extension.

Grammatical Change

Examples:

  • pronoun systems;
  • auxiliary use;
  • progressive;
  • modal changes;
  • syntactic regularisation.

Phonological Change

  • Great Vowel Shift;
  • rhoticity changes;
  • sound loss;
  • assimilation.

Standardisation

Stages often described as:

  • selection;
  • codification;
  • elaboration;
  • acceptance.

Influences:

  • printing;
  • dictionaries;
  • grammar books;
  • education;
  • state/administration.

Johnson

Dictionary contributed to codification but did not single-handedly “fix” English.


Prescriptivism vs Descriptivism

Prescriptivism

Language should follow rules of correctness.

Descriptivism

Linguists describe actual usage.

Aitchison

Challenges decay metaphors:

  • damp spoon;
  • crumbling castle;
  • infectious disease.

Use as discourse framework, not as universal proof.

Jean Aitchison

Language change is natural and systematic.

David Crystal

Often advocates descriptive recognition of variation/change.

A*: Evaluate language attitudes as social ideology, not just linguistic fact.


LANGUAGE DISCOURSES

Paper 2 asks students to analyse how people discuss language.

Discourses may frame language as:

  • declining;
  • improving;
  • threatened;
  • identity marker;
  • moral issue;
  • political issue.

Common Discursive Strategies

  • anecdote;
  • nostalgia;
  • authority claims;
  • statistics;
  • metaphor;
  • polarisation;
  • moral panic;
  • appeals to tradition;
  • presupposition.

Questions:

  • who has authority?
  • whose variety is privileged?
  • what ideology is constructed?
  • what linguistic evidence supports/challenges claim?

DIRECTED WRITING

AQA requires adaptation for:

  • audience;
  • purpose;
  • genre.

Potential forms:

  • article;
  • opinion piece;
  • speech;
  • blog;
  • letter;
  • information text.

A* writing:

  • controls register;
  • uses genre conventions;
  • deploys linguistic ideas accurately;
  • creates clear line of argument;
  • avoids sounding like an essay with a fake heading.

NEA — LANGUAGE INVESTIGATION

Strong Research Questions

Specific and data-led.

Weak:

“How does gender affect language?”

Better:

“How do male and female presenters differ in the use of mitigated directives in three episodes of…?”

Investigation Structure

  1. introduction;
  2. research question/hypothesis;
  3. methodology;
  4. data rationale;
  5. analysis;
  6. interpretation;
  7. evaluation;
  8. conclusion;
  9. bibliography/data appendix.

Methodology

Discuss:

  • sample;
  • representativeness;
  • ethics;
  • transcription;
  • coding;
  • reliability;
  • variables.

Quantification

Use counts/percentages where useful, but integrate qualitative analysis.

Correlation does not prove cause.


ORIGINAL WRITING

Possible purposes:

  • persuade;
  • inform;
  • entertain;
  • narrate.

Possible genres:

  • journalism;
  • travel writing;
  • memoir;
  • speeches;
  • fiction;
  • opinion.

Commentary

Explain deliberate choices using linguistic terminology.

Commentary structure:

  • audience/purpose;
  • genre models;
  • structure/discourse;
  • lexis;
  • grammar;
  • graphology;
  • intended effects.

Do not simply paraphrase what you wrote.


A* ANALYSIS PARAGRAPH

Use: Feature → Evidence → Technical Analysis → Context → Meaning/Representation → Link

Example:

“The modal auxiliary ‘must’ expresses high deontic modality, constructing the writer as institutionally authoritative. Because the text addresses novice employees, this asymmetry of expertise legitimises a directive relationship…”


COMMON LOST MARKS

  • feature spotting;
  • inaccurate terminology;
  • saying “formal language” with no evidence;
  • treating mode as binary;
  • ignoring representations;
  • theorist dumping;
  • applying obsolete gender theory as universal truth;
  • confusing accent and dialect;
  • treating child forms as errors rather than development;
  • stating stages as rigid age boundaries;
  • describing all caregiver speech as simplified;
  • prescriptivism presented as linguistically factual;
  • language-change essay with no data;
  • investigation with huge uncontrolled corpus;
  • commentary explaining content instead of language choices.